Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpanther
“And how does “honest” science work when it's construed as an “anti-religion”, is it “sincere” then?”

Are you now declaring that any disagreement with “religious” beliefs equals insincere or dishonest?

161 posted on 01/30/2009 3:40:16 PM PST by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Pox

Still incapable of answering a question without asking one I see...

You were the one that, by dancing around my first question, (and now this one) asserted that any agreement with ANTI-religious belief equals “honest, sincere, objective”...

that’s still your bag not mine.

Try to focus, can science only be science and only be honest or sincere when it’s obviously anti-religious, or only done by secular humanists?

If you’re going to go on demanding Christians and their ideas be be kept out of science class, or any public enterprise for that matter, the least you could do is explain why your position is more beneficial to science, or is somehow the right path to take, etc.


195 posted on 01/31/2009 6:16:27 AM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson