Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
The UK position on Jerusalem

Don't take this the wrong way, but: F the UK.

It was their ineptitude that caused most of this grief in the first place and, as suck, their opinion means exactly dick to me.
28 posted on 01/28/2009 9:08:50 AM PST by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Filo
The reality is that the UK position is really our position and most of the world's. Congress has passed various laws and resolutions on the status of Jerusalem essentially alligning our position with that of Israel. However, Clinton and Bush 43 have either received waviers or ignored the requirement for the US Embassy to move to Jerusalem. The reality is that Congress makes these laws and resolutions for domestic consumption but give a wink and a nod when it comes to taking any concrete action.

If the US were to unilaterally move our Embassy to Jerusalem and recoginze Israeli sovereignity over an undivided city, it would essentially end our role in any future peace negotiations and inflame the Arab world even further against us. Currently, virtually every country with diplomatic relations with Israel has its Embassy in Tel Aviv or its environs. I predict that Obama will delay any move to Jerusalem of the US Embassy just like Clinton and Bush did.

55 posted on 01/28/2009 9:57:10 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson