Replies

You said — “As you know asking for documentation is NOT a conspiracy.”

Well, it’s right there — in that line — that the problem exists, and you should know that, too — from what I’ve said before.

It’s that it’s not required, which is why this is going nowhere. The laws that *will require* it — are now being formulated by the state of Arizona and the state of Oklahoma. I hope more states get on board.

The “conspiracy” represents the *mindset* of those who think that even without legal proof in a court of law and even without any legal requirement to produce a specific kind of document, or any kind of court order of the same — that when this does not happen — it *is a conspiracy* — and that is exactly what a number of posters think (who are into this line of thinking about the qualifications issue). So, yes — it’s a “conspiracy” in the minds of those going down this track.

I call it “Obama Derangement Syndrome” (someone else’s term).

The court cases are not going to go anywhere, absent the *legal requirement* (which no other President has been required to do, either). So, the courts are not going to apply something to one President that has not been required of other Presidents.

What have other Presidents been *required* to do? Well, very simply — exactly what Obama did. What did Obama do? Well, very simply, signed statements (from him, his campaign and his party) that he is qualified.

That’s why this is going nowhere.

You should know that’s what I’ve been saying all along, and that I’m calling it “conspiracy” — exactly because people who want this *particular documentation* are calling it “conspiracy” when they don’t get exactly what they want....

Two states “on board” so far — Arizona and Oklahoma. Any other takers?