I just happened to notice this, now — “Mark my word: There is more to this than the BC”
You know..., that is most likely true, that there is a lot more here than what’s been put forth and done about the qualifications issue (per the Constitution).
What one has to realize is that whatever the other stuff is — it’s really a matter of finding something that “resonates” with the voting public, or is able to “gain traction” some way. That’s the only way that things like this make a difference in politics.
I know that there are people upset that one thing or another is not paid attention to and it just doesn’t seem right, but it does work that way in politics. It’s not always like going to a court of law and expecting clear-cut decisions. Even then (going to a court of law) doesn’t work either, as should be apparent now (and especially with Clinton’s “lack of conviction” in the Impeachment process).
I think people are going to have to be a bit smarter than just hammering on every little detail of one problem or another. It’s a matter of finding the *one thing* that is going to “resonate* and “get traction” with the voting public. That’s a tall order, however.
In the meantime, all of the conservatives are faced with a current and sitting President with a lot of Democrat support in Congress able to put forth a lot of things which are against conservative principles. That’s the main fight now, I would say.
Until one thing is able to “gain traction” with the voting public, then it’s just spinning wheels and not really getting anywhere.
That’s why I posted that it was facing up to the “reality” of the situation in that the voting public didn’t think it was relevant (before the election and after the election) regarding the accusation that Obama is not qualified per the Constitution. That’s because the majority of the voting public (I would say the *absolutely vast majority* of the voting public, including a lot of conservatives) think he is qualified in that one respect.
If certain people persist in going down this track all through the Obama Administration, it will simply “sideline” them into this track and nothing much will happen from these people, other than that. That’s my particular “reality view” of the situation.
I would say it’s going to be a lot more effective dealing with Obama on what he’s going to do with Congress, as far as the conservatives are concerned about it, than anything else...
In that light, I’m calling this “Obama Derangement Syndrome” (not my title, but from elsewhere) and not getting anywhere, and not facing reality. That’s my position on it, and so when I post to that effect, it has nothing to do with me not being a conservative, but rather with my view of it being — “deranged” and “obsessed” and “consumed” with something that will result in nothing...
BUT, even so and even saying that, I’m sure that many will continue to persist in referring to me as a DU plant, an Obot, or having voted for Obama, etc. and etc... LOL...
As you know asking for documentation is NOT a conspiracy. It done every day in people everyday life. Following the cases in court is being done by some of the finest legal minds I know...not just dad....Many of the judges and lawyers in our area is following what is being done....and can’t believe he has not just turned the BC over.
Those who are researching bo history are not just looking at his BC, but his pattern in life that he is trying to hide.....Why hide them or rewrite them unless there is something to hide?
You won’t find anything if you chose not to look. Even Fitz can’t help but see some areas that need further discovery....Are you asking for people to stop looking?