U.S. Supreme Court denies Injunction request by Berg

Obamacrimes.com ^ | January 26, 2009 | Philip Berg

[luv2ndamend]

More interest.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87270

[Star Traveler]

You said — “More interest.”

ACTUALLY..., what is of more interest to me, given that the Supreme Court is never keen on giving out internal information on what they do — the *interesting question* — is who does Orly Taitz “appeal” to — when the Supreme Court denies giving out their internal information...

This is of greater interest to me....

[Calpernia]

I have wondered that too.

[luv2ndamend]

I am not a lawyer(as you can tell), has anything like this ever happen before? Who oversees the courts?

[Star Traveler]

Well..., of course, I’m not a lawyer either — but — I do know that there is *no appeal* higher than the Supreme Court, in a legal case... LOL...

That’s why I find it humorous that someone is asking them for information that they don’t give out and expects to actually get it... :-)

[Velveeta]

Good advice, LJ.

[Velveeta]

I’m quite certain it was not - since he didn’t have a Presidential Library before he took the Oath of Office.

But subsequently, we do know that Reagan didn’t put his birth certificate under seal for posterity.

[FreeManN]

While I respectfully disagree with Orly on the efficacy of motions to recuse and compel re: SCOTUS, I do think all her efforts have been in the utmost good faith.

In short, she obviously loves the USA and is working tirelessly to save our Constitution.

I feel likewise in my high regard for Joe Farah. Orly and Joe are two Patriots who will not give up on America.

[FreeManN]

‘While I respectfully disagree with Orly on the efficacy of motions to recuse and compel re: SCOTUS, I do think all her efforts have been in the utmost good faith.

In short, she obviously loves the USA and is working tirelessly to save our Constitution.

I feel likewise in my high regard for Joe Farah. Orly and Joe are two Patriots who will not give up on America.”

Let there be no mistake about the fact that I have the highest regard for SCOTUS as presently constituted as well.

[hoosiermama]

Mr. Berg filed his False Claim Act Lawsuit on 11/7/08. Mr. Obama was a private citizen on 11/7/08. Election was over but he was not president elect until 1/8/2009. Furthermore, he had resigned from his post as US senator. The time of filing, 11/7/08, may have been by design.

Did you catch this? Is this the sealed case?

[FreeManN]

Yes

Heres latest Press Release from Berg:

01/26/09: PRESS RELEASE - New Issue of GLOBE Magazine [Feb. 2nd] Highlights
Philip J. Berg, Esq. Efforts to Expose Obama not being “qualified” to be President.
Also, Berg states U.S. Supreme Court denied Injunction request but Berg has three [3] cases still open and Berg states he will prove Obama “ineligible” to be President

(Contact information and PDF at end)

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 01/26/09) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama announced today that the new issue of GLOBE Magazine [2/2/09 issue] highlights his efforts to expose Obama not being “constitutionally qualified” and therefore, Obama should be removed from office.

Berg also stated that the U.S. Supreme Court denied his request for an Injunction from the Conference that was held on January 16, 2009. However, the case that was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court, Berg vs. Obama is still pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals where Berg just filed a Brief on 1/20/09. Berg said I had bypassed the Third Circuit hoping that the U.S. Supreme Court would hear our case on an expedited basis because of the significance of the case.

The two [2] other cases are in Federal Court and I will advise you shortly about the status of each.

Berg said, “This is the 5th time GLOBE Magazine has highlighted the question of Obama’s lack of ‘constitutional qualifications’ to be President. The new story about Obama is the center spread and two [2] other pages. More and more people are aware of the fact that Obama does not meet the constitutional ‘qualifications’ and that this is the biggest ‘Hoax’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years.”

Berg concluded, “I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the thousands and thousands that have died defending our Constitution with the legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be President.”

[abigail2]

Thanks for that link..he wasn’t on jesse’s show again today.

[little jeremiah]

I just stepped in a little pile on another thread - I gotta follow my own advice! ;-)

(Last word-ism is another of their ploys.)

[luv2ndamend]

I figured as much because this thread was quiet. Yeah, I listened for a while till the snow got deep and had to clean the driveway.

[ColdDecember]

Yes, this is in reference to Mr. Berg’s sealed lawsuit. Please see post 197, 200, and 228.

[hoosiermama]

Thanks, power has ben down on and off today and having problems keeping up.

[FreeManN]

List of US Attorneys Offices for information regarding crimes committed during the 2008 Election;

http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/us-attorneys-offices-for-you-to-visit.html

[Calpernia]

Got it up with a more usable table form on her website too:

http://defendourfreedoms.org/usattorneys.html

[Calpernia]

Gore needs to share more of his global warmings. :)

[hoosiermama]

Those of us that live near the forest have furnaces and stoves that heat with wood. We use trees that have been blown down (It’s using our version of wind power) and we’ve called it conservation for generations.

AlGee & Co would prefer we all freeze cause it causes smoke and pay then money to his bogus companies.