Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BibChr
Apparently one can only fault scientific theories in the past tense.

One can fault current scientific theories; just bring scientific evidence.

But it is dishonest to criticize science for modifying its theories when new data come along. That is part of the scientific method.

87 posted on 01/26/2009 11:13:50 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

[[One can fault current scientific theories; just bring scientific evidence.]]

We do- you simply ignore it and run from it and call it ‘religion’.

[[But it is dishonest to criticize science for modifying its theories when new data come along.]]

Noone is doing that- We’re criticising science for ignoring the laws and continuing to hold onto soemthign that doesn’t work- big difference here i nwhat you claim and hte actual facts-


101 posted on 01/26/2009 11:29:50 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson