To: Just mythoughts
Well, they are two different things but certainly are not separate as without abiogenesis there is no life for evolution to randomly act upon and without evolution the slime just remains in the pool forever.
To exclude abiogenesis from evolutionary theory is like eliminating one’s birth from their life story.
123 posted on
01/26/2009 12:14:20 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
To exclude abiogenesis from evolutionary theory is like eliminating one’s birth from their life story. Considering that biologists writing about life are writing an autobiography, it's not unreasonable to stick to the parts they can remember.
Eight-five percent of the history of life has been erased.
125 posted on
01/26/2009 12:17:26 PM PST by
js1138
To: count-your-change
To exclude abiogenesis from evolutionary theory is like eliminating one’s birth from their life story.Actually, it's more like excluding their conception. Would you consider any biography that didn't include that information to be incomplete and therefore unreliable?
126 posted on
01/26/2009 12:19:15 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: count-your-change; betty boop; Alamo-Girl
To exclude abiogenesis from evolutionary theory is like eliminating one’s birth from their life story. Excellent!
185 posted on
01/26/2009 2:50:25 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson