Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
Near the end of the article this statement appeared. it is one sense the most important conclusion to be drawn from the article:

“It is now common for otherwise sophisticated evolutionary thinkers to simultaneously claim that strictly naturalistic evolution (of one form or another) is a fact, and that anything else is ruled out a priori. Evolutionists say that evolution is a fact and that non-natural theories do not qualify as science and cannot even be evaluated. [4]”

“a priori” here used means simply, “you agree with me that evolution is a fact, a fact that makes any other conflicting explanation false, then we have a discussion”.

103 posted on 01/26/2009 11:31:17 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: count-your-change

That is precisely what I have in mind when I call neo-Darwinian evolution a faith-based religion. It has been so right from the beginning.


127 posted on 01/26/2009 12:22:35 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson