Replies

Here is part of Donofrio says... (there is more)...

—

Chester Arthur perpetrated a fraud as to his eligibility to be Vice President by spreading various lies about his parents’ heritage. President Arthur’s father, William Arthur, became a United States citizen in August 1843. But Chester Arthur was born in 1829. Therefore, he was a British Citizen by descent, and a dual citizen at birth, if not his whole life.

He wasn’t a “natural born citizen” and he knew it.

We’ve also uncovered many lies told by Chester Arthur to the press which kept this fact from public view when he ran for Vice President in 1880. Garfield won the election, became President in 1881, and was assassinated by a fanatical Chester Arthur supporter that same year.

How ironic that the allegations started by Arthur Hinman in his pamphlet entitled, “How A British Subject Became President”, have turned out to be true…but not for the reason Hinman suggested.

Hinman alleged that Arthur was born in Ireland or Canada as a British subject. It was bunk. It’s been definitively established that Chester Arthur was born in Vermont. But Hinman turns out to be correct anyway since Chester Arthur was a British citizen/subject by virtue of his father not having naturalized as a United States citizen until Chester Arthur was almost 14 years old.

—

The link is at...
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/06/urgent-historical-breakthrough-proof-chester-arthur-concealed-he-was-a-british-subject-at-birth/

There is more there, and there is other information (other than Donofrio) which would say that he was born in two other places, other than the United States. So, I guess you can have your pick of them all... LOL...

thanks for your efforts, Star Traveler.

I wonder if this thread would be a good place to start a new

FR TROLL HOUSE CLEANING?

Sometimes, this place doesn’t even sound conservative on some threads any more.

SHEESH!

Right. It says, "It’s been definitively established that Chester Arthur was born in Vermont."

I believe Donofrio makes the argument that Arthur wasn't a natural born citizen, even though he was born in Vermont.

This is based on the status of his father and it's a false argument. The father's citizenship has no bearing.