Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

You said — “The “order” that I’m most interested in is a court ORDER from a judge, any judge, anywhere, that issues a subpoena for Barack Hussein Obama II’s original, long form, vault copy Certification of Live Birth from the Hawaii Department of Health.”

Yes, it would definitely be something I would like to see, also. I don’t think it’s going to happen, though. And I think state laws are going to be required which demand this documentation, in order plug the loophole in the vetting system that has been discovered.

Arizona and Oklahoma have started this process.


102 posted on 01/26/2009 9:44:34 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
Arizona and Oklahoma have started this process.

Admitting a problem exists is the first commonly recognized step towards fixing a problem.

And the process of "fixing" the vetting "problem" seems to me as if it will inevitably generate questions of motivation by whoever (Democrats?) constitute the "loyal opposition." And those questions will inevitably generate answers on the public record. All of which do not to me seem to bode well for a coverup or instilling public confidence in retaining an existing coverup under normal circumstances.

IOW Obama Jr. has (IMHO) put a pendulum in motion, albeit perhaps unintentionally, and it will be IMHO at a minimum interesting to observe if attempts to stop the pendulum of the Hegelian Dialectic will in fact have the opposite effect.

Specifically, it is difficult for me to imagine to bring up the issue in a state legislative body without bringing about the strong possibility that the said legislative body will find a credible way to solve it. Similarly, it is difficult for me to imagine that some states will solve the problem while other states will leave the problem unaddressed. Beyond that, it is difficult for me to imagine that Obama will not be forced by the sheer weight of public opinion to address the issue squarely (all it might take, for example, is to discuss "ex post facto" considerations in a state legislative body, and then stand back and grab a box of popcorn for the argument that would ensue). Again this all presumes, of course, that federal and state government takes the normal course, martial law is not declared, etc.

Certainly similar questions-- such as Presidential succession-- have been brought up and successfully dealt with in the past, but IMHO never under such immediate political pressure and such high political stakes.

118 posted on 01/26/2009 11:18:18 AM PST by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson