[raybbr]

No, but this was: "There is another aspect of the financial crisis that generally goes unreported. The reason? Both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are to blame for the other reason. I’ll get to that in Part Two." I guess that wasn't obvious enough, so it had to be laid out for those with sub-par reading comprehension.

Oh, please. You used quasi yellow journalism to get people's attention. You also knew that your first part would blame the dems and hoped that everyone would jump on board.

That that little disclaimer is at the very end shows your intentions.

If you truly had wanted us to know that you put the blame squarely on both sides then you would have (or should have) stated that at the onset of your post.

I have done nothing but provide you with information and have been polite about it. The fact that you have to attack me shows that I have pulled your covers and you are not happy about it.

[wartman]

If you truly had wanted us to know that you put the blame squarely on both sides then you would have (or should have) stated that at the onset of your post.

The fact that this portion was titled Part One with a portion at the end saying that Part Two would deal with the problems that Republicans have also caused renders your point that I am somehow a partisan Republican moot.