Danae commented:"It’s all plausible. What’s more, is anyone in Hawaii in 1961 could have registered a birth. Regardless of where the baby was actually born, he could easily have been born in Kenya and brought to Hawaii and then registered as having been born at a STREET ADDRESS as opposed to a hospital. He would then have a Hawaii Certificate of birth, but still have been born in Kenya. All it would take would be for his mom and a witness to lie. No one would have asked for any proof whats so ever." Mlo responded: What is your proof for this claim?
Mlo, you might want to take a reading comprehension course so you would be able to understand the difference between a claim and a supposition. There is one claim in Danae's remarks and that is that you can have a birth certified in Hawaii without being born there. It is done all the time, and in fact Bozo's sister has a certification of live birth from Hawaii but was born in Indonesia. This is known.
The rest of Danae's comment was supposition and no claims were made so no proof required.
"Mlo, you might want to take a reading comprehension course so you would be able to understand the difference between a claim and a supposition. There is one claim in Danae's remarks and that is that you can have a birth certified in Hawaii without being born there." You might want to take a course in civility. I asked about her claim. You don't deny there was one. So why the rudeness?
BTW, asking to back up a claim isn't disputing it. I want to know what the evidence is.