Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ASOC
Bush did this differently, and was savaged for it. His loss.

To be fair, Bush did replace all (or most) of the US Attorneys when he took office in 2001. What was different was that he also fired a few of those who he had hired, in the middle of his term. That action was somewhat unusual. There was, of course, nothing wrong with what he did(they do, after all, serve at the pleasure of the President), but it was unusual.

25 posted on 01/20/2009 9:49:38 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

True, thank you for expanding on the comment.

The ones fied mid term raised Cain as well. THe Press was happy to dive in and - well, we all saw the results.

Bush will be remembered for many things, as is -say, Jimmy Carter.

I guess the real proof will be in what we tell our grandkids, eh?


27 posted on 01/20/2009 9:54:47 AM PST by ASOC (This space could be employed, if I could only get a bailout...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Conscience of a Conservative; wastoute; Badeye; Dustbunny; skeeter; ASOC; Gaffer
Thanks to Conscience of a Conservative for correcting the error in many of the posts here. Bush did begin his term by firing all of Clinton's U.S. Attorney appointees. I don't know of any recent change of party control of the White House that didn't involve firing all or almost all the U.S. attorneys.

Obama will surely do the same, though he might retain Fitzgerald to avoid any appearance that he's trying to short-circuit an investigation that could affect him personally.
33 posted on 01/20/2009 10:43:32 AM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson