Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
that the executive order issued by President Bush.. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090116-1.html Friday Jan. 16th gave an opening to pin Obama with information they have but it can only be accessed by a federal employee and it needs to be accomplished by 11:59 am EST, on Tue. Jan. 20 because 5 min after taking office Obama will revoke it

So something is in the Bush order, they have the information but they need someone to get it for them? Could it be the port of entry discussed in the divorce decree thread? The federal employee better do it vewwy carefully. Obama will have them cut off at the kneecaps.

20 posted on 01/19/2009 2:09:23 PM PST by MirandaRietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: MirandaRietz

(b) Exceptions to Reciprocal Recognition. A gaining agency is not required to grant reciprocal recognition to a prior favorable fitness or suitability determination when:

(i) the new position requires a higher level of investigation than previously conducted for that individual;

(ii) an agency obtains new information that calls into question the individual’s fitness based on character or conduct; or

(iii) the individual’s investigative record shows conduct that is incompatible with the core duties of the new position.


21 posted on 01/19/2009 2:15:32 PM PST by MirandaRietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: MirandaRietz; et al
The Executive Order only applies to contract employees and members of "excepted service" or political appointees. It has nothing to do with elected officials. Sorry to disappoint.
Section 1. Policy. (a) When agencies determine the fitness of individuals to perform work as employees in the excepted service or as contractor employees, prior favorable fitness or suitability determinations should be granted reciprocal recognition, to the extent practicable. . . . b) "Contractor employee" means an individual who performs work for or on behalf of any agency under a contract and who, in order to perform the work specified under the contract, will require access to space, information, information technology systems, staff, or other assets of the Federal Government. . . . c) "Excepted service" has the meaning provided in section 2103 of title 5, United States Code, but does not include those positions in any element of the intelligence community as defined in the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, to the extent they are not otherwise subject to Office of Personnel Management appointing authorities.

33 posted on 01/19/2009 3:10:39 PM PST by DeepThought42 (No mercy, no quarter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: MirandaRietz

That is why it sounds like a load of bull. There are plenty of federal employees that could have been found by now. This executive order came out on the 16th.

If the Bush Administration was truly providing an opening here for the Obama BC stuff....don’t you think they would already have some ‘federal employee’ already ‘standing in’ to take this all the way?

However...if this EO can be used in a court of law by those of us looking for the truth about Obama....Praise the Lord!


65 posted on 01/19/2009 7:39:03 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: MirandaRietz; LucyT
that the executive order issued by President Bush.. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090116-1.html Friday Jan. 16th gave an opening to pin Obama with information they have but it can only be accessed by a federal employee and it needs to be accomplished by 11:59 am EST, on Tue. Jan. 20 because 5 min after taking office Obama will revoke it

So something is in the Bush order, they have the information but they need someone to get it for them? Could it be the port of entry discussed in the divorce decree thread? The federal employee better do it vewwy carefully. Obama will have them cut off at the kneecaps.

Okay. Now that sounds sensible, according to what lexicology I can perform on this legalese.

But by "reciprocity," does it not require that the federal employee had already been begun to be reinvestigated? If so, would this have already happened, by this time?

If someone intends this to be a ticket to investigate Obama, I would think that person must have someone(s) prepared, who have either filed by now, or who intend to, in time.

76 posted on 01/19/2009 8:43:51 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson