A very thought-provoking rant touching upon key points of loyalty to those on the tip of the spear both in Iraq and on the border.
Additionally, the "new tone" is as naive and dangerous as Hussein proudly announcing he'd sit down with Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Kim Jong-Il, Fidel Castro.
Letting the Fifth Column Fourth Estate define the war and persecute our fighters is damaging to morale and security.
When Murtha slanders and Sulzburger leaks, the men in black should have put them in the Yuri I. Nosenko Hospitality Suite in the fourth subbasement for the duration.
Now we have the logical extension, the post-partisan uniter finding moral equivalence between Georgia and Russia.
CryptoIslamoCommie from Kenya riding in on an ass, the drive-by media as Quisling Republicans scatter rose petals and Chris Matthews shudders.
"Getting along" with evil is not a good thing. At all.
You said it Phil.
The Commander-in-Chief has no business labeling rogue nations as members of some vague ‘Axis of Evil’ unless he fully intends to take them out as you would with any adversary.
As GWB flies back to Texas, Ahmadinejad’s Iran is closer than ever to an operational nuclear weapon, North Korea’s Kim Jong Il has not been induced to halt Pyongyang’s pursuit of a nuclear capability, and this means that both the Far East and the Middle East are actually MORE unstable than before GWB took office.
I’m not at all saying that Iraq should not have been liberated, far from it. Getting rid of Saddam was good for the neighborhood, he was a terrorist, simple as that.
The problem is that after securing Iraq, our illustrious President didn’t do squat about, or to Iran, or North Korea. His inaction emboldened them, and it will be GWB’s inexperienced and naive successor who will be making the decisions on how best to deal with those adversaries.
That alone, ought to bring about widespread revulsion, for GWB’s failure to finish the job he started, and horror, in anticipation of what Comrade 0bama is likely to do once sworn in as President (legal or not).