Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hattend
The LCD screens also use alot more electricity than the old vacuum tube screens, although not as much as the plasmas. Those bans will end up being applied to LCD tech too.

Hey, Why NOT? The Guv'mint has killed the auto industry with their insane regulations, now they are going to kill the electronics industry the same way.

122 posted on 01/12/2009 10:25:36 AM PST by Joisey (BARACK OBAMA HATES RICH WHITE PEOPLE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Joisey
The LCD screens also use alot more electricity than the old vacuum tube screens, although not as much as the plasmas.

That's only correct if not taking into account and adjusting for the generally larger size of digital TVs. Comparing per square inch, plasma TVs are using on average 10%-25% less energy than CRT (plasmas use less energy when displaying darker picture or motion scenes, while vacuum tubes / CRTs and LCDs power usage is basically constant) and LCDs are using about 25%-50% less than plasmas, depending on the light / brightness / contrast parameters and settings. CRTs and plasmas also emit a lot more heat than LCDs. CRT sets have the most lead, LCDs have the least. Some newer LCDs wih multiples of 60Hz internal frequencey (120 / 240 / 480Hz) to reduce pixelation, might use more energy, but still not as much as plasma. According to preliminary studies, the upcoming LED / OLED TVs will use much less energy than LCDs (30%-60% and not requiring backlighting), in addition to having brighter colors. But that's still years off commercially.

237 posted on 01/12/2009 5:16:09 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson