You don't appear to be able to keep up, or don't need to since the Axelrod script doesn't allow for deviations from the talking points. A government document expert has gone on court record in California attesting to Polarik's exposure of the forgery aspects, agreeing with his assessment. Besides, the document is unacceptable on the face of it since the thing has the number blacked out and states on the face of the document that such alteration voids the document. But we can understand why you desire to believe lies for your messiah.
Do try to loosen those kneepads, syncho
Wrong. All she did was conclude that it is impossible to determine whether a scanned image on the internet is authentic.
This is not true. The expert did not endorse any forgery allegations. She only repeated basic document examiner requirements, like having to work with the original document instead of scan. What she said could have been said about any legitimate scan of a document.