A lot of good reasoning in that observation.
IMO Leo and Corts cases were not viable because they placed the burden on the SoS. The SoS would have no problem of proving they did not have that in their job discription and that it would be an undue burden to have all 50 states vet each candidate for each office.
Also IMO Berg places the burden on BO, DNC, FEC et al. It is more plausible, but until last week Berg didn’t have standing and I’m not certain without the Amicae brief attached it could do more than prove BO not eligible....If they ever could get to discovery.
Berg’s military case that is in the DC district again only questions eligibility. However, it seems at this time to have the best chance of getting to discovery....OTOH, Nothing c/would be ordered to establish responsibility to vet, a legislative responsibility for the future.
The bottom line BO, the executive branch is challenging the other two branches. He is destroying the constitution for his own ego and power....a dangerous man.
You know..., if Obama didn’t have any problem with being a natural born citizen of this country — he would still be just as big a problem with his liberal ideas for all us conservatives.
So, the way I see it, is that he’s a big problem because of what he’ll do in office, more so than being natural born or not natural born. Of course, the hope has been that there is enough evidence to produce for a court that something can be done about Obama being in office. But, I really question whether there is something that can be done on that particular issue.
At this point, I think it’s just going to come down to how do conservatives manage all that is going to happen with this Democrat Congress and this liberal President, who I never thought (originally) would be in office...
I know there are going to be people who hang on to “doing something” about either stopping Obama before January 20th or doing something after he’s in office, but I really don’t think it’s going to come down to that at all. But, I don’t *make reality* happen — I’m only saying this is what I think is going to happen. So, no matter what I say — it’s going to happen regardless of my judgement on the matter. That’s why I don’t know why anyone can get mad at me — because I sure don’t *make things happen*... :-)
Now, I’ll be glad to have someone “review” my statements after January 20th, after one year, after four years — and see whether I make an accurate assessment or not. I think it will turn out to be true — but even if that’s the way it turned out — I sure didn’t make it happen that way.
One would think, by the way some post to me, that I’m making this all happen just because I say so...
—
[besides that, what can I even do to stop anyone from filing court cases or doing whatever it is that they want to do... nothing — nothing more than make my assessments here of what I think is going to happen...]