But, you can’t say that getting a piece of legislation through the Oklahoma legislature, with it already having been sponsored and put in the works, right now — is conspiracy stuff — because that’s “real world” politics and putting real world legislation in place that can “close up the hole” that Obama walked straight through.
***I have encouraged you in that effort. Learn to read. But the hole is not closed up until January 20, so why don’t you just get lost until then?
There’s just a huge *disconnect from reality* here with some posters going down this track.
***That’s just freeping hilarious, coming from an alien abductee dude.
That’s all I can say about it. You’re letting your *desires* for getting Obama out of office try and “create a reality” where no such reality exists in real life.
***Maybe you’re engaging in a bit of projection here. It’s the first time I’ve considered it, but now it makes sense seeing how you buy into that alien abduction stuff. Having a tenuous hold on reality... “create a reality”... yup, that’s the kind of stuff you’d have experience with.
Now, you mentioned something about damage to the Constitution. That’s another wild idea that can’t happen without going through “procedures” that will *have to be followed*.
***Fine, then address my analogy of the 3rd amendment. What friggin procedures are there? There are very few because this hasn’t been much of an issue in our entire history. The fact that there aren’t good procedures in place to support a constitutional requirement is often a sign that this area hasn’t needed it in the past. But trolls seem to have a problem comprehending this.
You can’t change the Constitution without 3/4 of the states ratifying it.
***POTO.
And it usually takes years (sometimes 7 or more years) to go through the process.
***POTO.
And all Amendments to the Constitution just don’t breeze through such a public vote in the various states.
***POTO.
So, it’s even crazy to say that Obama is going to do something with the Constitution when you have to get 3/4 of the states to ratify any Amendments.
***POTO, and a straw argument because I’m not looking to change the constitution, I’m looking to enforce it.
This is another “unreal’ wild idea that some people are promoting. Nothing is going to change with the Constitution — without the states ratifying it.
***Again with the POTO thing, and again with the straw argument thing. Do you EVER have a valid argument? Can you put together two posts that do not contain classic fallacies in your arguments?
And I don’t see the states ratifying any changes that mess with the Constitution.
***POTO plus straw argument, same as above.
You’re starting to foam at the mouth..., is all I can say about it... LOL..
—
You’ll basically see what happens on January 20th and after that. I’ve listed what is going to happen, so you can see if it comes true or not...
What will be somewhat entertaining is to see how long people can keep this up with nothing happening that they want to happen. I do remember how long Chief Editor Korir kept his hoax going over at API (African Press International) that sucked in Berg and Ed Hale — thinking that Michelle Obama was on tape saying that Obama was not a natural born citizen. I was actually amazed at how long Korir kept that hoax up and kept Berg and Hale on it, too.
So, as a bit of “anthropology” and the study of hoaxes, it will be interesting all right...