Of course the accuracy of such depends on the integrity of the archivist or research person. What were they actually looking at to copy? At this time there is no real check on this, save trust in what must be an extremely important document.
To my chagrin, when someone kindly showed the authorization of that particular document (Barack Obama) it was on the reverse side. The signature was of an important and qualified individual. That settles the matter, said I and breathed a sigh of relief.
My dismay was that the signature was a routine statement made with a rubber stamp. This included the signature of Dr Onaka. There is no way in a court of law, the good Dr (not a medical doctor) could be held liable for a rubber stamp signature.
I asked then and maybe he has, verified what was apparently his authority, at least verbally.
I had queried the reverse side of the COLB for Barack Obama. The format stated that the information on the front was certified as accurate as to form and or abstract. I was dubious because the signature of Dr Onaka was a mere rubber stamp.
Another Freeper has stated that on October last, Director Fukino and Director Onaka had stated they had seen the original document and verified the COLB.
This still does not lay the matter to rest. Simple questions and simple answers are needed from the President himself. After all, look at the aggressiveness of some of the press against the departed President.