When one doesn’t take to “common sense” about something — the best answer is to “wait and see”.
So, it would seem that for you, the best answer is simply going to be — “we’ll see if it works out the way you say — or — it works out the way I say it will...”
—
I’ll be talking my common sense and I guess you’ll be talking yours, too, won’t you. I’m confident that my common sense thinking will actually be the “real life situation” that we see actually transpires...
When one doesn’t take to “common sense” about something — the best answer is to “wait and see”.
***I look forward to you waiting and seeing. Glad to see you’ll be logging off these threads.
So, it would seem that for you, the best answer is simply going to be — “we’ll see if it works out the way you say — or — it works out the way I say it will...”
***You don’t get it. I’m not saying that. You are. You’re the one who’s saying what will happen. I’m the one saying that this is a legitimate discussion that doesn’t hurt the credibility of FR any more than the 0.2% chance that this thing has beaten by getting this far in the SCOTUS ... are you calling judge Roberts a conspiracy theorist? He sees something to this issue, so why don’t you? Why do you go out of your way to dismay & disrupt these threads when you keep saying you have your own little project in Oklahoma. Go do that and leave us alone.
—
I’ll be talking my common sense and I guess you’ll be talking yours, too, won’t you.
***Oh, so now you WON’T be waiting and seeing. You’ll continue to spread your classic fallacies.
I’m confident that my common sense thinking will actually be the “real life situation” that we see actually transpires...
***I’m confident that you’re trying to set yourself up for gloating. That’s what’s really going on here. But since I never claimed anything about what is going to happen, you’ll be wrong then as well, even if what you say came true. You really should take that critical thinking class.