There is no statute, no case law, and no person with standing which requires production of documents of a President-Elect.
***Buncha baloney, especially in light of the 20th amendment which takes priority over statutes because the constitution is the highest law of the land. The “no case law” thing is a red herring. There’s very little case law covering the 3rd amendment but if some army general said you had to put up his friends for a year rent free, the constitution has plenty to say about that. The lack of case law is a sign that this area of the constitution hasn’t been tested.
On what basis is it “their job”?
***Common Sense. Precedence. 20th Amendment. Congressman Billybob’s prior comments. The same basis established in Marbury v Madison. I’m not a lawyer but I’m sure the lawyer dudes will fill in the blanks for you.
There is no duly-constituted authority which has requested or required Obama to do what you want.
***The duly constituted authority is the constitution. It is the highest law of the land and it states the requirements for eligibility.
The Supreme Court is not a free-ranging Committee of Public Safety.
***And a big giant “so what” to that. There’s a lot of things the SCOTUS is not.
It’s not like the French Cour de Cassation, which (descended from the revolutionary CPS) has the very powers you want the USSC to exercise.
***Lawyer dude weigh-in time, since I don’t know what you’re talking about.
READ THE CONSTITUTION! If you have half a brain your questions will be answered. If not you are either a MORON and/or an obot.
I just pulled my copy from my law school Constitutional Law Text Book. Therein, the Constitution is ONLY 15 pages long. If you can not read a whole 15 pages then just read Art. II (5), it is only 1 paragraph.
Now I am going to the gym to work off my frustration with the MORONS who elected this FRAUD, bo. When I return the MORONIC OBOTS will be ignored by me. However, I will continue to enjoy discussion with those reasonable men and women who have actually read the Constitution.