Hats off to you both, gentlemen for clarification of this ridiculous dialog between plebeians searching for answers to very complex issues.
Now, ALL, instead of questioning each other constantly let us ALL agree to be more civil to each other. The name calling is ridiculous. This is critical time in our country we are facing a constitutional crisis. Stop fighting about the process and unite in fighting the problem. And if you doubt that there is a problem with qualifications check out the INS # presented last evening. It's the data entry that supports the hypothesis.
Jim R. Is it possible to ban some words....Like we did with “Bushbot” on the dose thread. Each side could suggest the most harmful, hurtful they would like to see disappear.
Certainly, the flow of open discussion is positive, but I have been appalled by the Judicial Temperament exhibited by some professed lawyers to lay people who are searching for answers. There is only one person that comes to mind as more arrogant......
Many of us here would like to see a much more courteous discussion with such an important topic and with so few conservatives actively searching for documentable answers.
We are taking the lead on zero's eligibility since talk radio has abandoned us for some unknown reason. Even more reason why we need to stick together and forget about infighting.
A little premature there.
"Now, ALL, instead of questioning each other constantly let us ALL agree to be more civil to each other. The name calling is ridiculous."
Questioning is fine. That's what should be happening. But I'm all for civility, as I've already expressed. I hope people can live up to it.
"And if you doubt that there is a problem with qualifications check out the INS # presented last evening. It's the data entry that supports the hypothesis."
I'm not familiar with whatever you are talking about. Can you enlighten me?