Actually, I agree with Sandra Ramsey Lines (who dares to use her name), however I disagree with your statement that she agrees with Polarik that the CoLB is a forgery. Here's what she says: "After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.
She doesn't say its a forgery, she says an image published on the internet can't be verified one way or another.
She goes on to say; "Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, “Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?” It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for oliterating it."
The images of the CoLB published on the factcheck.org site do have the certificate number.
how does that story from jesus go about the truth falling on stoney ground and Obama trolls swooping in?
Hmm - you misquote the Bible, adding your own little twist, and didn't capitalize the "J" in Jesus. Why should I take you seriously?
You should not take me seriously. Nitpik all you care to, it only shows your agenda to obfuscate the actual issues at hand, Obamanoid. I have nothing but contempt for you folks. Twisting and deceiving is your stock and trade and you are taking over at FreeRepublic. Enjoy.