Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mojitojoe
And we see how sincere the trolls are: Star Traveler and mlo mocking
1,023 posted on 01/16/2009 6:55:49 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1017 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Star Traveler and mlo mocking Photobucket
1,025 posted on 01/16/2009 7:10:45 PM PST by mojitojoe (Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1023 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN; mojitojoe; mlo

You said — “And we see how sincere the trolls are:”

Well, when someone doesn’t agree with you on the matter, it seems that they are always trolls. That’s the problem you continually have. Let’s look at that and see what was said about it.

A poster on the thread said — “SCTUS has actually done something. They have sent the Berg case back to the lower court.”

And the answer came back from another person — “They were asked NOT to do that. They were asked to take the case from the lower court. They said no.”

Now, *that* kind of thinking is exhibited quite a bit on this issue. A defeated case or a setback on an issue (which *by the way* Berg himself calls it a setback for his case) — is “spun” to be a “success”.

That’s *exactly like* what people heard with “Baghdad Bob”. He would be standing there with the TV camera on him, telling about the success they were having, right when the pictures behind him showed them getting slaughtered.

There’s a *big denial of reality* here — when there *is* a setback — it’s “spun” into being a “success”. That’s exactly like “Baghdad Bob” was doing. This happens again and again on this issue. It’s like there’s no reality checks here, at all...

At least Berg can say it’s a setback — but — someone here can’t say it’s a setback — but it’s a “success”. It just doesn’t make any sense at all...

That’s why I think it’s a lot more rational to be working on this state legislation, like in Oklahoma, where they are going to get the law to say specific documents must be presented, in order to vet the Presidential Candidate. That’s a lot more real and it has a very good chance of getting through the legislature. It’s a lot better chance for people to work with their states than it is working all these cases that keep getting kicked out, denied, kicked down and so on (but nothing ever happens that ends up *actually* getting Obama out of office.

Can you imagine what will happen when Obama comes to the state of Oklahoma and they say he has to produce his birth certificate? Now, that’s something real...

Don’t be a bunch of “Baghdad Bobs”....


1,026 posted on 01/16/2009 7:11:15 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1023 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
"And we see how sincere the trolls are: Star Traveler and mlo mocking."

It's not quite that simple but I'm not even going to get into it. Turn-around is fair play. After the way you and your friends have behaved I have every right to make fun of any ridiculous statement I see, and that would still be more civil than you are in nearly every post.

1,033 posted on 01/16/2009 8:45:39 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1023 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson