The rest of the world's scientists, engineers, and health care workers say, “Gee! That's nice!” and get back to their own work ( which involves many or **all** of the research tools **you** may use). Work that has absolutely NOTHING to do with macro-evolution ( the processes needed for the **appearances** of Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species. )
By the way if you are one of the very few who are involved in this narrow slice of biology, congratulations! I am sure it is very interesting.
I think I understand what you might be saying. Because research processes that are used in thousands of scientific pursuits throughout the world are also used in your field of molecular Biology and evolution, are you concluding that the **entire** world therefore is worried about or interest in or rests upon the work of Molecular Biology Evolutionists?
This is like saying architects, brick layers, wall board appliers, bridge builders, and electrician all use tools, carpenters do too, so that makes everyone a carpenter.
There are a **lot** of people using the **same** techniques you are. They just are applying them to different goals. That you use the same techniques as everyone else, and may occasional invent a new technique or application, does NOT mean that the other people are the least bit interested in macro-evolution ( the processes needed for the **appearances** of Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species. )
Most people do not use any Newtonian physics in their daily life.
Do you contend that we should not teach Newtonian physics due to this fact?
Most people will do not use any History in their daily life.
Should we not teach History?
“There are a **lot** of people using the **same** techniques you are.”
And none of them work at CRI or AIG.