To: labette
True Christians are smart enough to know a literal reading of the Bible is superficial and decidedly non-Christian. It belittles the greatness of God. The Catholic Church has learned that when physical reality and the Bible do not agree, it is the human interpretation of Scripture that needs to be re-examined.
43 posted on
01/08/2009 5:41:05 AM PST by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: doc30; metmom; betty boop; Fichori; valkyry1; MrB; GodGunsGuts; Alamo-Girl; CottShop; ...
True Christians are smart enough to know a literal reading of the Bible is superficial and decidedly non-Christian.It belittles the greatness of God. The Catholic Church has learned that when physical reality and the Bible do not agree, it is the human interpretation of Scripture that needs to be re-examined.I'm speechless.
65 posted on
01/08/2009 1:21:00 PM PST by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: doc30; labette; betty boop; Fichori; valkyry1; MrB; GodGunsGuts; Alamo-Girl; CottShop; ...
The Catholic Church has learned that when physical reality and the Bible do not agree, it is the human interpretation of Scripture that needs to be re-examined. Reality? What reality? The *reality* that someone decides they see in the lab?
In case you haven't heard, "truth" is a word best avoided in science.
What about the thought that if science and Scripture conflict that it's the human interpretation of the SCIENCE that needs to be re-examined?
Or has it never occurred to you that science could be wrong about something?
151 posted on
01/09/2009 8:37:00 AM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson