Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lmr
I think there is a point in which some lines must be drawn. I don’t think that telling the Amish to observe the same local building codes as everyone else is an over-reach.

If they were Amish contractors wanting to sell houses to non-Amish buyers you'd be right. But since both builders and occupants of the houses in question are Amish (possibly the same people) and don't want the stuff mandated, and the lack of the stuff doesn't endanger anyone not a part of the transaction, what's it to the goobermint if they want smoke defectors or not? You're in effect protecting them from themselves.

(Yes I know the goobermint does it all the time, but I don't agree with it those times either)

31 posted on 01/06/2009 10:56:39 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking
If they were Amish contractors wanting to sell houses to non-Amish buyers you'd be right. But since both builders and occupants of the houses in question are Amish (possibly the same people...

If the Amish could guarantee self-ownership for the entire economic life of the property, then maybe...

Anyhow, I understand. I don't wear a seatbelt and I might participate in a tax revolt real soon. ;-)
35 posted on 01/06/2009 11:02:16 PM PST by lmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson