Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz
The NYT piece states: Tourists can obtain a free, 30-day visa (necessary for Americans) at border crossings and airports. Transportation within Lahore is plentiful, with taxis, scooter rickshaws and horse-drawn tongas (especially in the old city) readily available. Insist that taxis and scooter rickshaws use their meters to determine fares, however. Americans needed a Visa to enter Pakistan so there must not have been a ban.

No, sorry, I said evidence. You have continually posted for facts. NYT communist family articles is not evidence. You take a article out of NYT as factual but you refuse to accept that any information you have read is true about Obama? You believe everything you read in main stream media do you?

There must not have been a ban you say? So you are spreading more assumption like earlier when you said Obama's mothers birth place is not in question? But you can't prove where she was born, can you? You can't prove that travel to Pakistan was illegal either? For that matter travel to Cuba is banned but still Americans go all the time, right? All the same to you?

So in your mind if Obama traveled there it was legitimate? So where is his 30 day VISA? Wouldn't it be easy to just place it for all to see so they don't wonder about dual citizenship? By the way Obama has admitted dual citizenship on his website. Where are the other travellers others mentioned who went there at the time? Why is it only someone saying, my brother went there and had a great time partying..no name...or my cousin.

You have just posted more propaganda that you came to this website to disapprove of. Nothing else.

I would suggest that if you want to show evidence you write that letter and post it her for everyone to read when they say, yes, travel was possible without a passport during that time. Until then, let the arguments against that theory continue.

859 posted on 01/14/2009 11:07:18 PM PST by MirandaRietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]


To: MirandaRietz
You say that there was a law prohibiting U.S. citizens from traveling to Pakistan but are somehow unable to state the name of that law! Could you tell me what president signed the law? Was it the same president who in 1981 gave $3.2 billion to Pakistan?

In 1981, about two years after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, the United States provided General Zia-ul-Haq, Pakistan's military ruler, with $3.2 billion in loans and grants. The idea was to elicit Pakistan's help in ousting the Soviets from Afghanistan. Included in this package, at Pakistan's insistence, were 40 F-16 aircraft.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/149257

863 posted on 01/14/2009 11:15:40 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies ]

To: MirandaRietz
I would suggest that if you want to show evidence you write that letter and post it her for everyone to read when they say, yes, travel was possible without a passport during that time.

????

870 posted on 01/14/2009 11:58:17 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson