Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gidget7
His family Was warned, told to leave the home, they refused, saying they were human shields. According to FOXNEWS.

I wonder how that worked out for them?

Can someone point out for me the sections of the Geneva Conventions that legitimizes the use of non-combatant human shields?

33 posted on 01/01/2009 9:45:20 AM PST by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961; gidget7

re: “human shields”

Just another reminder of the incredible double-standards that prevail throughout the world

No one would even think of having “human shields” against the Islamo-fascist scum who DESIRE to kill as many innocent people as possible.

Only Israel, the USA, and a few other civilized countries could be expected to concern themselves with not harming “human shields” — yet the same people who expect unlimited respect for their use of “human shields” are the one who would never care how many they kill in pursuit of their own cause.


38 posted on 01/01/2009 9:52:43 AM PST by Enchante (Bernie Madoff Learned His Ponzi-Investment Strategy from our Social Security System!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson