Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: incredulous joe
I believe the basis for their conflict was that Becket wanted the clergy to be tried for any crimes committed in an ecclesiastical court and Henry II wanted them tried in a civil court. It appears exemption from civil law was a great incentive to be a “clergyman” in name only.

More of a power struggle than anything else I think.

30 posted on 12/31/2008 6:19:21 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


bump!


31 posted on 12/31/2008 6:25:25 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: count-your-change

“It appears exemption from civil law was a great incentive to be a “clergyman” in name only.”

“More of a power struggle than anything else I think.”

There is a lot of very dense “legal” material available on this subject, and certainly a good many Catholics with time, energy and pointier heards than mine to take up the cause for Becket on these issues.

I’m not certain what your agenda may be, but I won’t go that road with you. Becket certainly put himself in harms way for his beliefs.

Certainly a good model for Catholic bishops, and the depths to which pro-life Christians should go for their cause, which I think is more to the point of the original post about Becket.


32 posted on 12/31/2008 6:52:33 AM PST by incredulous joe ("No road is long with good company. " - Turkish Proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson