Posted on 12/30/2008 6:33:51 PM PST by BGHater
Despite keeping Defense Secretary Robert Gates in the Pentagon, President-elect Obama’s transition team informed 90 Bush appointees their services will not be needed after Inauguration Day.
Scott Gration, a senior official on Obama’s transition team, called and emailed several of President Bush’s Pentagon appointees about 10 days ago to inform them they were being dismissed.
Those calls and emails were followed up by an email from Jim O'Beirne, the special assistant to the secretary of defense for White House liaisons, who expressed exasperation that Gration informed the employees directly instead of letting O'Beirne's office know first.
"With regard to the process, I am unable to provide an explanation," O'Beirne wrote on Tuesday in the email, which was obtained by The Hill. "I played no part in it, and I will not speculate why matters were handled as they were."
A spokesman for the Pentagon said Gates was "absolutely satisfied" with the way the transition was handled.
Gates "is sensitive to the fact that a number of appointees will not be able to stay on after [Jan.] 20th," Defense Department spokesman Geoff Morrell said. He noted Gates did request many appointees stay on and the "Obama team was able to cooperate."
But O'Beirne made it clear in the email that in some cases of dismissal, he thinks the employee's politics played a role in their being let go.
O'Beirne said that Gates had "sought to keep virtually his entire team in place pending the availability of Obama replacements."
Out of roughly 250 political appointees, 90 were dismissed.
"Whatever negotiations occurred in pursuit of that goal, the Gration notifications evidently reflected the results of those efforts," O'Beirne wrote.
Traditionally political appointees resign at the end of a president’s term, leaving the new commander in chief to put his own team in place but with Gates staying in the top Pentagon job there was reason to believe many of his staff would also stay.
The Obama team noted that a majority of the political appointees will remain in place.
"Given that our nation is at war, we have asked several political appointees at the Department of Defense to stay in their jobs past January 20th to help ensure a smooth transition. We are grateful for the cooperation and professionalism of the men and women at the Department of Defense in support of our men and women in uniform," an Obama transition official said.
Bush has repeatedly stated that he wanted to see an orderly transition to ensure that the next president would hit the ground running at a time when the country is fighting two wars and weathering one of the most significant economic crises in modern times.
Until now, that process seemed to be going smoothly as a number of departments have reported efficient and even cordial working relationships between Bush appointees and transition officials. The holiday Pentagon dismissals appear to be the first breakdown.
In the email, O'Beirne tried to assure the soon-to-be displaced employees that the decisions were based on "policy change in the Obama administration" and not based on performance.
However, he said, if employees "harbor residual doubts" then they can "content yourself with the likelihood that it was your outstanding performance as a Bush appointee that drew the opposition's attention to you."
"In that regard, you may take justifiable satisfaction that you were among the first to be chosen," O'Beirne wrote.
Other reasons O'Beirne cited for employees' dismissal were "politics, matter of policy and availability of qualified replacements and the strength of the permanent career and uniformed staffs."
Morrell, a political appointee who is staying at the Pentagon, noted that while O'Beirne is usually the liaison for political appointees Gates chief of staff Robert Rangel has taken over that role. Rangel is also staying on.
"Jim has had to defer many of the things he could normally respond to," Morrell said as a possible explanation for the email.
Where does one begin with this?
I take it former CAREER POLITICIANS under Clinton will be accepting these positions?
Yipes!
I predict Gates will last less than a year.
I’m sure the “messiah” has already investigated himself over this. Not to worry! Everything is kosher.
They would not have to dismiss me. At 12:00 January 20, 2009 I would be gone on my own accord.
OK... I’ve lost count. How many broken promises, lies, obfuscations and head fakes is this now? At least I agree with MO. I am ashamed of my country.
You are probably right.
Where is the list of those being let go??
Class, real class. /tu
Classy. Fired by e-mail.
Gates to 0: FU, strong letter to follow.
I haven’t seen one.
From what I have seen, when obama runs for re-election in 2012 he will get the votes of 95% of the members that are currently on this forum.
I agree: Gates wont be around long. Political appointments aren’t expected to stay when the new man comes in. Payoff’s to people who helped in the election have to be made.
Friends have friends who need work , it’s a confusing arrangement and people who take political appointments know that. In the end its may not be Chicago payola but in reality there is little difference.
Prominent murder suspect Bernadine Dohrn let off hook
President-elect Fires Northern District of California US Attorney
Appointees fired, civil servants transferred. Entire staff gone.
Washington, D.C. "I wish he'd wait until January 20th," said a Bush Administration spokesman. "This is getting old!" . . . .
What Congress were you expecting to investigate this? I can guarantee you that our current House and Senate certainly won't.
Bush's transition was delayed due to Al Gore's contesting of the Florida returns. A willing Bill Clinton refused to release transition funds until late December of 2000. Contrast this with Obama declaring an "Office of the President-Elect" as soon as possible.
Democrats in the Senate obstructed the appointment of Bush's Cabinet and Under-Secretary positions until 9/11/2000.
Obama cannot be allowed to rewrite the book on comparing presidential transitions and presidential history-by-comparison. He has declared too much of his past background as off-limits to be allowed to demand no scrutiny with past presidents.
-PJ
Doesn’t matter, all politicians (especially presidential candidates) do it, knowing they have years to mollify the masses before re-election is upon them again. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.