Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid: Senate won't seat Blagojevich pick
CLTV ^ | Dec 30, 2008 | Ray Long and Rick Pearson

Posted on 12/30/2008 11:49:22 AM PST by BAW

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) said in a statement this afternoon that the Senate will not seat anyone Gov. Rod Blagojevich chooses to fill Illinois' vacant Senate post, amid word that the governor is set to name former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris.

The statement also is signed by U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, who has repeatedly urged Blagojevich not to name a replacement for the seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama. The statement specifically names Burris, but applies to any choice the governor might make.

"This is not about Mr. Burris; it is about the integrity of a governor accused of attempting to sell this United States Senate seat," the statement read. "Anyone appointed by Gov. Blagojevich cannot be an effective representative of the people of Illinois and, as we have said, will not be seated by the Democratic Caucus."

The decision was made during a 10-minute conference call that included Reid, Durbin and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), as well as representatives of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). There was little discussion and no dissent in reaching the position, said a Senate aide.

"The goal was to get this statement out before Blagojevich made his announcement," the Senate source said.

Blagojevich, who has sole authority to name a replacement senator, scheduled a 2 p.m. news conference at his downtown Chicago office.

Burris left his downtown consulting office about 1:15 p.m., getting congratulatory hugs from several employees. But Burris refused comment when asked whether he was going to accept the appointment after word that Senate Democratic leadership would not seat him.

Shortly after Obama's Nov. 4 victory, Burris made known his interest in an appointment to the Senate but was never seriously considered, according to Blagojevich insiders. But in the days following Blagojevich's arrest, and despite questions over the taint of a Senate appointment, Burris stepped up his efforts to win the governor's support.

Though he is 71, Burris has said that Obama's replacement should be able to win re-election and he has noted that despite a string of primary losses in races ranging from Chicago mayor to governor and U.S. senator, he's never lost to a Republican.

Blagojevich's criminal defense attorney Ed Genson had said Blagojevich would not name a Senate successor to Obama. The governor had indicated he agreed with other Illinois politicians that the best option might be a special election to fill Obama's seat. But state lawmakers have not taken up the necessary legislation.

Burris has given more than $20,000 to Blagojevich's campaign fund on his own and through his consulting and law firms, state campaign finance records show. Burris' consulting company received about $290,000 in state contracts with the Illinois Department of Transportation a few years ago, according to state comptroller records.

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada previously warned Blagojevich, following the governor's Dec. 9 arrest, that Senate Democrats would not seat any appointment the two-term Democratic governor made. Reid's warning was contained in a letter signed by all 50 sitting Democratic senators, including the No. 2 Democrat in Senate leadership, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois.

Federal authorities, citing secret wiretap recordings, allege Blagojevich sought a Cabinet position, an ambassadorship or a high-paying job from the incoming Obama administration in exchange for naming a candidate favored by the president-elect to the vacancy. An internal report by the Obama transition team found no offers of any quid pro quo in conversations held by incoming White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and Blagojevich and the governor's staff regarding the seat.

Burris became the first African-American to win statewide office in 1978, when he won the first of his three terms as comptroller. But Burris repeatedly stalled in his quest for bigger political office. He failed in three consecutive runs for governor--1994, 1998 and 2002, when he ran against Blagojevich--in the Democratic primaries.

Burris, an attorney in private practice, could not be reached for comment at his home today.

A special state House committee is weighing whether to recommend impeaching Blagojevich, and a leading member of the panel today called the news "incredibly ill-advised."

Rep. Lou Lang (D-Skokie) said he believed his colleagues on the panel "will take the position that the timing is so wrong as to put a cloud over the appointment."

"It certainly wouldn't be a legal cloud," Lang said. "It would be more of a political cloud."

Rep. Jim Durkin, the Republican spokesman on the impeachment panel, said he is drafting a letter to Burris calling for him to reject the appointment.

"I think the governor can do what he wants, but I think that Roland Burris should not accept it," Durkin said. "He left government under a good standing, and this is not a way to re-enter it. If he does accept it, I will take any means necessary to have him testify before the special (impeachment) committee."

Durkin, citing the federal probe into Blagojevich's alleged attempt to sell the Senate seat, said the matter is at the heart of the impeachment investigation and the federal criminal charges against the governor. Durkin said he wants to know when Burris talked to the governor or any of his aides about the Senate appointment, what was discussed and what, if any, material was submitted.

"If he does accept this," Durkin said, "I want to know the circumstances on which his name rose to the top in the last 24 hours."

Durkin said he knew of nothing that Burris had done improper, noting "he's a good and decent man."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: blago; blagojevich; bleepgate; burris; chicagocorruption; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; durbin; harryreid; il2008; obama; obamascandals; obamasenateseat; obamatransitionfile; pelosicongress
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: BAW

Somebody make some popcorn. This is going to be good.


141 posted on 12/30/2008 10:13:45 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW
Roland Burris


142 posted on 12/30/2008 10:20:49 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

“I read elsewhere that Reid and the Senate can’t refuse to seat the appointee. They can only expel on a 2/3 vote. If true, this will be even more fun...”

I heard Karl Rove on Fox tonight. He opined that, arguably, the Senate cannot refuse to seat; can only expell.

In any event, this keeps democrat corruption in the news, and that gives right-thinking Republicans an opportunity to speak to the news, about this aspect of our governmental process.

With Reid, Durbin, et al speaking out so strongly, it shows they fear the impression that it could make. So politically Reid’s position is the smart one to take.


143 posted on 12/30/2008 10:36:03 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r; All

You are correct the Houses of Congress have sole authority over who is allowed to fill Senatorial and Congressional seats. They may expell with a 2/3s vote.

See Article I, Section 5, paragraphs 1-2 in the Constitution.


144 posted on 12/30/2008 11:18:01 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Congressman Adam Clayton Powell of Harlem was refused his seat by the House in the 60s. He ran again, was re-elected and the House said “what the hell” and seated him.


145 posted on 12/30/2008 11:23:10 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Reid is a racist.


146 posted on 12/31/2008 12:40:01 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking in Kansas

Whom do they want to be the Senator?


147 posted on 12/31/2008 2:33:56 AM PST by perez24 (Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

“senate won’t seat blagojevich pick”

all of these democrat commissars are not comfortable with behaving within the law. theirs is a world of arbitrary actions that perpetuate power. (kind of like watching a bunch of unpredictable wild animals.)

IMHO


148 posted on 12/31/2008 4:38:22 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
You racist.


/sarc>
149 posted on 12/31/2008 5:20:53 AM PST by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

So — the president-elect -— not even president yet, can say who the Senate can seat???

Talk about abuse of executive branch power......


150 posted on 12/31/2008 5:54:09 AM PST by acsrp38 (greedy -- bitter clinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Shame on these people. Now they are trying to throw Blago under the bus? please, dont try and blame everything on blago democrat party


151 posted on 12/31/2008 6:02:51 AM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

SENATE REFUSES TO SEAT ILLINOIS NEGRO APPOINTEE


152 posted on 12/31/2008 6:07:58 AM PST by hamburglar (Do Unto Obama As Liberals Did Unto Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

The “Adam Clayton Powell” seating in the House of Reps was the one I was thinking of. I had forgotten that that was overturned in the USSC.

On reflection you wouldn’t necessarily want a majority of the House arbitrarily refusing to seat a duly elected individual who was otherwise constitutionally-qualified.


153 posted on 12/31/2008 6:39:26 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Harry, guess what, it’s not your call.


154 posted on 12/31/2008 6:40:19 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
Re#143 Good morning. Agreed--I love that it is in the news, is purely a rat scandal and will not go away. Indeed, we are guaranteed weeks more as even if the rats could 'refuse to seat' him, they can't do that until seating time next month.

Eyes wide open, Burris cast his lot with Blago and will not play ball with the rat party--egos can be a good thing. Having Bobby Rush play the race card (so calculated and transparent) was a little icing on the cake. Further, that Reid (now joined by BO) came out so forcefully that Burris would not be "seated" is just too funny. They should have done their research first. Because scandal sells papers, the presstitutes will have to play the only game in town. And BO is associated with it by name. Kind of takes the shine off the 0ne. Gotta run--you and yours have a safe, blessed and Happy New Year...

155 posted on 12/31/2008 9:17:57 AM PST by eureka! (Dear Lord: Some epiphanies for some of the 'rats now in charge, particularly BO? Please...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: BAW
Sorry folks, Reid is right. They can refuse to seat him.

The Dems are closing ranks against Blago. Obama and Reid have come out against this move, and that is that. Blago can kick and scream for a while and make this ugly, which he undoubtedly will as he is fixated firmly on his own dick and not the welfare of his state or the country.

All that's left now for Blago is an Oscar-worthy portrayal of a lovable, charismatic leader who's being persecuted unfairly by the mean, evil Feds.

156 posted on 12/31/2008 9:31:48 AM PST by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future"- Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
All that's left now for Blago is an Oscar-worthy portrayal of a lovable, charismatic leader who's being persecuted unfairly by the mean, evil Feds.

And I think he will succeed. If Sadaam Hussein can do it, anyone can.

157 posted on 12/31/2008 9:55:59 AM PST by littlehouse36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: dbacks
Here is another way to simplify the voting-—when a Black runs, only Blacks are allowed to vote; and when a White runs, only Whites are allowed to vote.
158 posted on 12/31/2008 10:32:39 AM PST by GOPologist (Illigitimi non carborundum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: BAW

What about voting?


159 posted on 12/31/2008 10:52:29 AM PST by Niuhuru (I'm A Racist and Proud Of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

thanks, bfl


160 posted on 12/31/2008 1:33:36 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson