Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Despite pledge, Obama transition fails to disclose meetings; keeps promise with searchable inauguration donor database

The Obama team, pledging the ''most open and transparent transition in history,'' gets an ''A'' for disclosing donors to the Jan. 20 inauguration and a ''F'' when it comes to revealing transition meetings with groups. Contrary to its own ''seat at the table transparency policy,'' meetings are not posted on a Web site.

I'm giving a ''B'' to the Obama transition report on staff contacts with Gov. Blagojevich. The report was a summary narrative released last week of an internal inquiry into Gov. Blagojevich's selling-of-a-Senate seat scandal. While the Obama team deserves credit for disclosure -- including that President-elect Barack Obama and incoming White House staffers Valerie Jarrett and Rahm Emanuel met with federal prosecutors -- offering some notes or transcripts to support the conclusions would have been helpful.

During the presidential primary campaign, then candidate Obama, still an Illinois senator, made a pledge I heard for the first time on Oct. 24, 2007. In a school gym in Dover, N.H., Obama said if president, he would post his meetings on the Internet. That was interesting to me because Obama's Senate staff had been very selective about what Obama Senate-related meetings they disclosed and seemed to be guided by a ''less is best'' policy.

A month after the election, on Dec. 5, John Podesta, a transition co-chair, issued an Obama transparency policy. When it comes to meetings, ''the date and organizations represented at official meetings in the Transition headquarters or agency offices'' would be ''posted on our Web site,'' at www.change.gov.

Indeed, the ''seat at the table'' section states ''on this page, you can track these meetings, view documents provided to the Transition and leave comments for the team,'' but the statement is only partly true.

What is posted are materials -- for example, briefing or position papers -- submitted by groups in connection with a transition meeting. There is no list of meetings on the site, with a meeting defined in the policy as having three or more participants.

Transition spokesman Nick Shapiro, asked why the meetings are not posted despite the policy, said,

''This policy is part of President-elect Obama's commitment to run the most open and transparent transition in history. The transition staff has been instructed that this is a floor and not a ceiling. No transition has ever attempted to implement such disclosure requirements, and as we continue to evaluate the policy, refinements will be made to it."

There's better disclosure news when it comes to Obama's Presidential Inauguration Committee.

The PIC is providing near real time postings of donors of $200 or more, with a user-friendly searchable database at the PICs Web site, www.pic2009.org.

Donations are posted within 48 hours and include the contributors' state and employer.

In another advance on the transparency front, inauguration bundlers -- those who tap their personal networks for money -- are disclosed with how much they have raised.

The Obama team set $50,000 per-person contribution limit for the inauguration with a $300,000-per-bundler cap; no corporate or political action committee money is accepted.

The PIC is revealing more about bundlers than did the presidential campaign.

1 posted on 12/29/2008 1:10:14 PM PST by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: STARWISE

I STILL have no idea who this new President is. Today they show clips of him saying that Israel has every right to attack (used daughters as examples). This guy seems so much more conservative than George W. Bush. I am just waiting for the liberal shoe to fall that everyone said would happen, but thus far it has not even been seen. I say thank God and hope he does continue this strange unexplainable presidency.


51 posted on 12/29/2008 8:01:55 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

...His seat is probably up on EBay already.


55 posted on 12/30/2008 5:30:01 AM PST by cake_crumb (Waiting for Dear Leader Obama to drop sea levels and heal Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE; Condor51; PhilCollins

our very own CHICAGOLADY is pondering mounting a run for rahmbo’s seat

she’s a well known local activist and she lives in the district

let’s encourage her to for it


57 posted on 12/30/2008 6:11:48 AM PST by TheRightGuy (I want MY BAILOUT ... a billion or two should do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Based on the ratio of U.S. Senators to Congresscritters, this seat should go for about 1/9 the cost of Obama’s Senate seat, right?

I may need to know this as I try to get some cash togather...


61 posted on 12/30/2008 6:58:47 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I would be MUCH happier if he wold retire from politics all together.


63 posted on 12/30/2008 4:56:01 PM PST by Munz (Infiltrate Interrogate Eradicate NEXT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
This guy is so perfect---he's downright scary.

================================================

QUESTION Did Rahm fillout the 63-count seven-page personnel application Obama gave to possible appointees? If so, how did Rahm outline his ties to financial institutions involved in the federal bailout? His activities on the Freddie Mac Board? Did Rahm ever email Madoff?

REFERENCE Emanuel resigned his position as an advisor to Bill Clinton, in 1998 to become a Wall Street investment banker with Wasserstein Perella, (now Dresdner Kleinwort), where he worked until 2002.

In 1999, Rahm became managing director at their Chicago office. According to Congressional disclosures, Emanuel made $16.2 million in his 2 1/2 year stint as a banker.

Amazingly, Rahm became a multi-millioniare overnight----and he was wasn't even voted "Most Likely To Succeed." (snicker).

At Wasserstein Perella, Rahm worked on eight deals, including the acquisition by Commonwealth Edison of Peco Energy and the purchase by GTCR Golder Rauner of the ecurityLink home security unit from SBC.

He then ran for Congress; luckily members of the securities and investment industry became his biggest backers, donating more than $1.5M to his campaigns dating back to 2002, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Emanuel also leaned heavily upon the industry as 2006 Dem Congressional Campaign Committee Chair. Financial industry donors contributed more than $5.8M to the Dem committee, behind only retirees.

Pres Bill Clinton in 2000 named Emanuel to the Board of Directors for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"). Rahm's position paid him $31,060 in 2000 and $231,655 in 2001. During the time Emanuel spent on the board, Freddie Mac was plagued with scandals involving campaign contributions and accounting irregularities. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) later accused the board of having "failed in its duty to follow up on matters brought to its attention." Emanuel resigned from the board in 2001 when he ran for Congress.

Amazing career---stright-up trajectory---and he did it all by hisself (snicker).

In between Rahm's career choices, he won a coveted scholarship to the prestigious Joffrey School of Ballet.

65 posted on 12/31/2008 7:00:41 AM PST by Liz (The right to be left alone is the beginning of freedom. USSC Justice William O. Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
bump
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2155757/posts
68 posted on 12/31/2008 5:46:41 PM PST by smokingfrog (I'll go green when they plant me in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Who are Obama’s donors and what was this guy doing in Africa?


70 posted on 01/02/2009 4:01:16 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Somehow, I don’t think they are reporting everyone.


71 posted on 01/02/2009 4:03:17 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson