[Ol' Sparky]

Would you like to respond to the point? The point being that the known fossil record is incompatible with Darwin’s theory?

[MHGinTN]

You must be dense. You insult my intelligence then invite me to play in your sandbox by your rules. What a Maroon! Nowhere have I said Darwin got it all right. I admire the brilliance of his theory based as it was upon observation without the genetic science we have today.

I certainly would not step into your sty to give you ease to spread your smelly manure. It never seems to occur to fanatics like you that the final answers are not in, that you do not have all the pieces of a very complex puzzle, and that your ilk miss too many worthy points because of your condescending zeal to stomp someone for not following along as you lead into the abyss.

Go insult someone else for your ego trip, doofus.

[Dog Gone]

There can be no Cambrian explosion if you believe all life began in less than a week.

Plus the “explosion” is thought to have taken perhaps 30 million years, not exactly an overnight event.

It more accurately describes the period when life began developing the characteristics which permitted fossilization on a large scale. It doesn’t disprove Darwin’s theory at all. It’s supportive of it.