[Twotone]

I’m surprised she didn’t mention the one on limiting (or banning) small arms. Can’t remember the name of it off-hand. It’s the one that worries me the most!

[Joiseydude]

I believe that’s in the Global Poverty Act.

[Gandalf_The_Gray]

I’m surprised she didn’t mention the one on limiting (or banning) small arms. Can’t remember the name of it off-hand. It’s the one that worries me the most!

I don't agree because the UN would be incapable of enforcing any such treaty. If they sent in some "Blue Helmets" to round up the millions of American civilian firearms they would find that those Blue Helmets make excellent 10 ring targets.

I'm more concerned with the proposal to put a UN "tax" on international money transfers. If the UN ever freed themselves from relying on donations for funding and gave themselves the power to "tax" they would truly have crossed the Rubicon and gone from merely annoying to truly dangerous.

Would a standing army be the next agenda item? Followed by international control of all nuclear weapons...

Regards,
GtG