If the Berg Case ever goes before the SCOTUS, which it will not, Obama will claim protection under the Equal Protection Clause in that he is being held to a higher scrutiny than previous presidents. He would likely win.
Not on that basis. An argument could easily be made that Arthur was subjected to similar scrutiny when his eligibility was questioned. And, again, successful fraud (if there was) would not set any sort of precedent, but rather justify increased scrutiny as an appropriate remedy.
“If the Berg Case ever goes before the SCOTUS, which it will not, Obama will claim protection under the Equal Protection Clause in that he is being held to a higher scrutiny than previous presidents. He would likely win.”
WOW, you just admitted that he doesn’t meet the criteria!