Yes. Permit me to draw your attention to the particular comment:
"Unlikely because we know one can be native born and yet not a native born citizen of this country prior to the year 1866. "
What does that mean? Further, the site used to say that there were no laws addressing the subject of citizenship prior to 1866 (quotations available in some earlier posts on several threads), but that has been modified. I think the author is a Freeper due to the timing of changes made in the article(s) coinciding with discussion here on FR, but that isn't certain. The author's original assertions were demonstrated to be incorrect, and that hasn't really changed. They still rely on the same unsupported and circular arguments. Same goes for the 'jurisdiction' piece by this same P.A. Madison. While I generally evaluate the merits of claims made based on what I know rather than the letters attached to a person's name, the information on that site is both incorrect and anonymous, a fatal combination. Or, at least, the several times I have checked the site for changes and credentials, there were plenty of the former and none of the latter. I give the author credit for adaptability, but not for accuracy.