[trumandogz]

Can you show me where the previous 42 men that have been President have submitted conclusive proof that they were in fact natural born citizens?

Is there a place in the National Archives that holds the original 42 birth certificates?

[little jeremiah]

Kevmo - these questions deserve being on the list. Such red herrings!

truman - Red Herring. And you know why. But, for the record:

1. Birth certificates as we know them are a relatively modern invention, so obviously many previous presidents did not have them.

2. Even for presidents who did have birth certificates, why would anyone have asked to see them, if there was no doubt, question or mystery about their birth location and thus eligibility?

I can’t believe you’re dragging this idiocy around; it’s like someone with toilet paper stuck to his shoe being dragged around. Aren’t you ashamed of yourself?

And why does Berg’s idiocy make the rest of his life useless, when you give 0bama a pass on every bit of skullduggery, lies, racist “church” and all the rest? That’s perfectly okay?

And Berg is one case out of many. Why do you harp on him solely?

[Gemsbok]

trumandogz,
The lineage and backgrounds of our former 42 presidents were well established. None have sealed and hidden all of their documentation from birth records, educational records, employment records, and even legislative schedules.

Only your candidate has been deceptive, deceitful, and secretive about his entire life. Please explain why there could be so much to hide. Why has he hidden even his kindergarten records? What could possibly be so terrible that he has been forced to erase his past?

A presidential museum dedicated to him would be an empty box. But likely funded with hundreds of millions of untraceable dollars, just like the campaign.

[calenel]

"Can you show me where the previous 42 men that have been President have submitted conclusive proof that they were in fact natural born citizens?

Is there a place in the National Archives that holds the original 42 birth certificates?"

You know better. Only Arthur was seriously challenged and he was either legit or successfully pulled of his fraudulent usurpation. [I hold no opinion as to which case might be the true one] Obama hasn't proven his eligibility, nor has his fraudulent usurpation been thus far successful. Different principles, different technology, different era. The fact that it isn't fair doesn't mean we have to roll over for one fraud because another had a lower threshold to cross. You cannot create a precedent through fraud (at least not if they catch you).