Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldi
I was listening to Catherine Austin Fitts last night on the radio. She said the government would use “nonlethal weapons” — radiation, noise, whatever they have in their arsenal, and you’ll crawl back to where you came from.

The great weakness that a government labors under, is that all its weapons and forces depend on a bunch of secretaries and clerks going in to work and processing the purchase orders for the weapons and ammo, and payrolls for the forces. The clerks and secretaries live among the rest of us, and are subject to persuasion that working for the government is bad.

128 posted on 12/19/2008 3:19:19 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625; goldi; archy; Squantos

RE nonlethal crowd control methods: the Brits have done quite a bit of study of this going back to “the troubles” in Northern Ireland. What they concluded was that widespread employment of nonlethals (in those days, massive tear gas, water cannons etc) had very nasty unintended consequences. They might break up today’s mob, but the folks in the mob don’t just surrender, go home, and knuckle under to unpopular rule. They go home and dig up their guns, and start sniping stray soldiers. They also start making bombs. Massive use of nonlethals don’t end the problem, it ratchets it up to the next and more lethal level.


139 posted on 12/19/2008 6:41:51 PM PST by Travis McGee (--www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson