[Durus]

They may be genuinely “nothing to this stuff” but if you, and many like you, are correct you have simply guessed correctly. There has been absolutely no evidence given to prove this case one way or another. Those of us interested in the Constitution and the rule of law, and aren't willing to speculate wildly without evidence, depend on the USSC to stand up and hear the hard cases. So far they have simply stepped back with little valid reason.

[hinckley buzzard]

The reason this "case" is over is because it never got started. "Evidence" has nothing to do with it. The reality is, the court sees this as political nitroglycerine and after the 2000 debacle is not about to get into it. The potential for a true crisis, with paralysis of the succession and uncharted waters as to what next, all in the context of the current politico-economic and foreign threat quagmire, is far too high.

I would have liked them to make Obama put up too, but after he won a clear electoral victory, it was obvious that was just never going to happen.