Replies

As I pointed out, post #3 said this decision was based on PR.
***Here is what is said in post #3, and it does NOT say the decision was BASED on PR.

I have a feeling that the SCOTUS is gunshy about getting involved in another election since the 2000 debacle. This is simply a P.R. move.

That’s the post you said did not make the claim that the Supreme Court was corrupt.
***Again I say it. So your continued arguing for that case is a jump in logic which is not supported by the evidence, and your reasoning is fallacious.

Are you seriously attempting to argue that saying a decision was a PR move is not the same as saying it was based on PR?
***Yes.

I’m tempted to think you’re a troll trying to make Freepers look stupid.
***I have the same temptation towards you, so I’m pinging lj to add you to the CertifiGate Troll List. Maybe if you stop using classic fallacies you’ll redeem yourself. Or maybe if you take a critical thinking class. But jumping straight to insults with such little logic behind your position reveals your troll-like weakness.

I have the same temptation towards you, so I’m pinging lj to add you to the CertifiGate Troll List. Maybe if you stop using classic fallacies you’ll redeem yourself. Or maybe if you take a critical thinking class. But jumping straight to insults with such little logic behind your position reveals your troll-like weakness.
Oh noes! You're putting me on a list! Will that mean I can't get Chinese food delivered from Hop Sings? That you resort to putting people who disagree with you on a list (and that you were the first person to jump to insults) reveals your well-placed insecurity in your own arguments. Q.E.D.

I’d love to see the certificate troll list.

I’ve been keeping one of my own. Star Traveler has been inching her way up the list the past 36 hours. I suppose the trolls work in shifts and her shift likely ends this week! I wonder who will return next?