You said — “Fine. Let the Dem Congress do nothing about it and we will see them get routed that would rival their beating they got 1994.”
Well..., you’re missing the “history” of this problem that has been brought up about Obama not being qualified. The *history* is that the issue has been on the table for a long while. People have already had the opportunity and time to consider it all they want to (*if* they really want to).
Now, keeping that in mind, that there is history for this issue from before the election — it would seem that the election has already proven that the majority of the voters are not demanding this issue be “resolved” the way people here are demanding. In fact, the majority of the users are quite satisfied with Obama, just the way it is. He was voted in by a sizeable majority of the voting public — larger than Bush or Clinton, in the past. That’s significant.
Now..., how do you go from most of the voters approving of Obama and not thinking this issue is relevant — to — Congress getting “routed” for not addressing this issue... It simply does not make any sense from the vote of the last election.
History?
Like the way AP in this story lied by omitting the fact that Berg and Taitz cases are still active on the Supreme Court docket. A "history" presented by the Main Stream Media full of lies and distortions about this subject that would make the USSR press proud. Most Americans are in the dark about this issue.
And this is the sort of ‘reasoning’ you think is corerect?... “Now..., how do you go from most of the voters approving of Obama and not thinking this issue is relevant ...” Bwahahahahaha. Go tell David Axelrod that sort of layering of lies might work with the obamanoid voters who don’t even know who Joe Biden is, but it doesn’t work at Freerepublic.
they even knew about it before the election.
Most of the Obama voters did not even know that the Democrats controlled Congress, and you expect them to know that there were questions about the eligibility of The One to the office of President.