You said — “ Congress will have to act if Obama is not a natural born citizen.”
There’s the “Catch-22” situation... There’s nothing to show that he’s *not* a natural born citizen. In fact, he purports to show that he is actually a natural born citizen, by the documentation that he has provided.
That’s why Congress will not be forced into action.
“There’s nothing to show that he’s *not* a natural born citizen. In fact, he purports to show that he is actually a natural born citizen, by the documentation that he has provided.”
Wrong. He has admittedly shown *native* citizenship (and only if we take him at his word).
That’s why Congress will not be forced into action.
That's for the courts to decide if and when they take up the suits. The issue is not resolved, and the burden of proof is for Obama to prove he is a natural born citizen.
Fine. Let the Dem Congress do nothing about it and we will see them get routed that would rival their beating they got 1994.
Why don’t you just say he says he is instead of he purports to be a natural born citizen...
All any of us are asking to is his original proof of citizenship not a computer generated easily duplicated and manipulated truncated version created at the start of the election cycle....
This is not a search for the truth, it is an original verification of his eligibility.
We already know that he has admitted being a British subject as well as Kenyan citizen by virtue of his birth, both of which DO NOT REQUIRE HIM TO BE BORN IN KENYA, only that he is the son of his father.