“I don’t see that the “proof” is required, only that he’s qualified.”
What.
“What this last election with Obama has shown is that it’s the *process* that is defective and wrong. That’s why the process must be corrected.”
What we’ve seen is that Obama simply refuses to be reasonable about the matter.
“I don’t know why you can’t see that one...., that *yes* in this case of vetting a candidate, we do, indeed, need a law to that effect.”
Why don’t you go write some more laws then. Come back when you’re done. You can probably look at the DMV for examples on where to start writing your new laws.
You said — “What we’ve seen is that Obama simply refuses to be reasonable about the matter.”
“Reasonable” is not a Constitutional matter...
—
And then, “Why don’t you go write some more laws then. Come back when you’re done. You can probably look at the DMV for examples on where to start writing your new laws.”
I won’t be writing any new laws, but I will be petitioning my state legislators about them writing a law to vet candidates and for them to prove their Constitutional qualifications to be legally on the ballot.
Then, when that is done, it will correct the “process” that is defective, right now, which is what allowed this current issue to come about with Obama. After that, it won’t happen, any more, on a state-by-state basis.