You said — “Then I ask you, yet again, what is your FReeping problem with those of us who are correcting the process?”
I haven’t seen anyone working to correct the process. I’ve only seen people trying to get rid of Obama, when they *can not say* that he’s disqualified....
Now..., on the other hand, if I saw that people were working with their own states and talking to the legislators about enacting a state law to the effect of vetting candidates, then I would say that they are working to correct the process. I’ve seen none of that here, on Free Republic...
I haven’t seen anyone working to correct the process. I’ve only seen people trying to get rid of Obama, when they *can not say* that he’s disqualified....
***I say it. Obama is disqualified. Others have filed court cases saying the same thing. Those courts punted due to lack of standing. Did you know that as a voter you have no standing in the process? And yet, here you are deriding those who fight against such evil.
Now..., on the other hand, if I saw that people were working with their own states and talking to the legislators about enacting a state law to the effect of vetting candidates, then I would say that they are working to correct the process. I’ve seen none of that here, on Free Republic...
***I have. And the process is theoretically still in place for vetting the candidate. The 20th amendment says, “if the president elect shall have failed to qualify”, so that means it happens AFTER the general public votes, AFTER the Electoral College, it happens RIGHT NOW. We are correcting the process, we are engaging, we are addressing our grievances properly to the guvmint as the constitution says to do. One of the best examples is our own FReeper, Polarik, who has filed affidavits in Berg vs. Obama and generated a 160 page analysis showing that Obama’s BC electronic versions shown on FightTheSmears and Annenberg are forgeries. The reason why you don’t see it is you don’t want to see it, you’ve allowed the MSM to define what you think is the right course of action and you’ve stuck your wet finger to the wind to see which way popular opinion is blowing. We’re right at that point in the 20th amendment in the constitution and we’ve got REMF jerks like you shooting at us for not having our bootlaces tied correctly.
Since you are so focused on correcting the process, why don’t you lead the charge while others seek to invalidate a candidate that refuses to prove his elligibility?
We all eagerly await your first post on the topic!