You are glued the position that “citizen at birth” equates to “natural born citizen”. After all, they both have a derivative of the word “born” in them. Oh wait. “Naturalized citizen” and “natural born citizen” both contain a derivative of “natural”! They must be equal too! The usurpers of the world thank you for being a useful idiot.
Because nowhere in the Constitution is the term 'natural born citizen' defined. Because federal law identifies two types of citizens - citizen at birth and naturalized citizen. Because the Supreme Court has upheld the idea of two classes of citizen, and two only, in their Ark decision. And because of that 'citizen at birth' and 'natural born citizen' are one and the same. But mainly because unlike you I've read the applicable law and the relevant Supreme Court decisions.
The usurpers of the world thank you for being a useful idiot.
And would that make you a useless idiot by comparison?