"The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens."
I think more precise would be:
The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born IN -- OR OF -- the country, OF parent(S) who are citizens OF said country.
The intent is the 'natural born' citizen is NOT as likely to enjoy an allegiance to a foreign power as a naturalized citizen might.
The bottom line is the President is forbidden from having ANY sense of dual loyalty.
The concern of the framers was that a foreign power could come into the country and perhaps through intermarriage with a citizen, or even naturalization, install a President and thus rule by proxy.
There was even a concern when JFK ran of President that -- because he was Catholic -- he would be taking orders from the Vatican, in Rome.
… Of course JFK was fully qualified as a 'natural born' citizen, under the constitution.
The point is the President must not under ANY circumstances be in the pocket of a foreign power.
This is what makes Obama's strange and aberrant behavior in regard to his 'vital' documents -- including his vault birth certificate -- so alarming.
It's really a question of sovereignty.
Once the sovereignty of the country is lost, in what hands will the sovereignty (freedom) of 'the people' rest?
STE=Q
So, it is your view that a person born in the United States who at the time of his birth is eligible for citizenship of another country is not a natural born citizen?