Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: briarbey b
I 'm sorry to say this, but the Supreme Court's silence on this Obama eligibility birth certificate mess is really sad.

1. Here we are, the American public, crawling on our hands and knees begging the Supreme Court to please, please do something about this Obama eligibility mess, but the Supreme Court---for some unknown reason--- is completely, utterly silent on the issue, as if it didn't care what happened to the United States in the next four years during the first term of the mysterious ghost President Obama.

2. I mean, how hard is it for the Supreme Court to tell Obama to simply produce his long form Hawaii birth certificate---the one with the doctor and Hawaii birth hospital names on it---in order to prove that he is eligible to be president under the laws of the U.S. Constitution?

3. Doesn't the Supreme Court realize that when it looks around, it has no legal document in hand that proves that Obama was born in Hawaii?

4. Doesn't the Supreme Court realize that no state---outside of Hawaii---has ever seen Obama's long form birth certificate, the one with the doctor and Hawaii birth hospital names on it?

5. My God, Supreme Court. The least you could do is hear oral arguments as to why Obama is fighting so hard NOT to produce his Hawaii long form birth certificate---the one with doctor and Hawaii birth hospital names on it---in order to prove that he, Obama, is eligible to be president under the laws of the Constitution of the United States.

6. NOTE to the Supreme Court: Doesn't it bother you that not a single Hawaii hospital has come out publicly and announced that Obama was born there, if, as Obama claims, he was born in a hospital in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961?

106 posted on 12/16/2008 8:29:45 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: john mirse
NOTE to the Supreme Court: Doesn't it bother you that not a single Hawaii hospital has come out publicly and announced that Obama was born there, if, as Obama claims, he was born in a hospital in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961?

Federal and State privacy laws forbid any health care provider from giving out information about a patient, even information confirming that someone was a patient.

So, it's not surprising that no hospital has confirmed that Obama was born in Hawaii because doing so, without his permission, could put them in legal hot water.

166 posted on 12/17/2008 8:36:41 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson