Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy

Well, then. That settles that. Happy days are here again...


8 posted on 12/15/2008 5:30:15 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (appeasement is collaboration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the invisib1e hand; Shermy

Dateline 1972
President Nixon said Monday a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct involvement in the Watergate break-in and his White House aides “did nothing inappropriate.”

Nixon said he is prepared to make the review public, but decided to hold off because prosecutors asked for a delay and “I don’t want to interfere with an ongoing investigation.”

Controversy has swirled around the president and his White House chief of staff H. R. “Bob” Haldeman, following the Watergate arrests last week on charges the Republicans were engaging in illegal “dirty trick”.

Nixon, fielding questions at a news conference, sidestepped when asked whether G. Gordon Liddy had any dealings with the arrested burglars.

Liddy was one of several aides who watched the news conference from the wings.

The president pledged the results of the investigation by his White House counsel would be released “in due course.”

He said the probe was complete and thorough, but did not say which of his aides his lawyer interviewed, whether any of them was under oath at the time, or any other details.


63 posted on 12/15/2008 8:23:31 PM PST by BenLurkin (Mornie utúlië ...... Mornie alantië)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson